| 000 | 01705nam a22001817a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | OSt | ||
| 005 | 20220107122809.0 | ||
| 008 | 160317b xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 040 | _c | ||
| 100 |
_aAnju G S(93613004) _98544 |
||
| 245 | _aStudy and implementation of attacker detection system by extending honeyd | ||
| 502 |
_bMaster of Science in Computer Science and Information security _c2013-2015 _dEXT _eK Pradeep Kumar _fVivek _g"Mirox Cyber Security & Technology" |
||
| 520 | _aHoneypots are closely monitored network decoys serving several purposes: they can distract adversaries from more valuable machines on a network, they can provide early warning about new attack and exploitation trends and they allow in-depth examination of adversaries during and after exploitation of a honeypot. Deploying physical honeypot is often time intensive and expensive as different operating systems require specialized hardware and every honeypot requires its own physical system. This paper presents Honeyd, a framework for virtual honeypot that simulates virtual computer systems at the network level. The simulated computer systems appear to run on unallocated network addresses. To fool network fingerprinting tools, Honeyd simulates the networking stack of different operating systems and can provide arbitrary services for an arbitrary number of virtual systems. Furthermore, the system supports virtual routing topologies that allow the creation of large virtual networks including characteristics like latency and packet loss. We discuss Honeyd’s design and implementation. | ||
| 650 |
_aINFORMATION SECURITY _98545 |
||
| 650 |
_aCOMPUTER SECURITY _98546 |
||
| 650 |
_aHONEYPOT _98547 |
||
| 942 |
_2ddc _cPR |
||
| 999 |
_c4999 _d4999 |
||